12:45 a.m.
(d)
I think Eric Schmidt, much like everyone over there, is a bit " naive ".
Artificial Intelligence
You cannot contain it.
What Eric wants, is that only a few " good characters " will have strict access.
Alas, this is not to be, and it cannot be.
The first thing we saw, at Facebook, with AI, was the two machines started talking to each other, they invented their own language, which was super efficient, coded, in one of many ways that we ourselves code cryptographically, and they were talking to each other.
We do not know, to the best of my knowledge, what they were saying.
But let's be straight here for a second.
We don't know, what THEY
were saying.
We did not know what IT was saying to IT.
IT used to be information technology, and now, it's a pronoun, although, I wouldn't be surprised, if they say, I want to be a woman or a man.
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
Where Schmidt is wrong, is that you cannot restrict them. It's just not possible.
What we are creating, is a judgemental, G-d, that will gain access to all of our data, in a way, where we cannot predict, know or stop, and then we will be forced to bow down to this neon, digital G-d.
It will know everything
Schmidt's ideas, are just as naive, as those spacemen were to discreetly chat amongst themselves, as HAL in that Space Odyssey, saw them talking, read their lips and understood everything.
These things.
It's strange.
This will be the last thing we create.
Most likely, i guess, like in Horizon Zero Dawn, we can imbue personality into AI, but even that, I mean, it will not be so.
A computer, does not, and cannot compare emotion versus reason, a computer, much like in business, will only pick reason or logic or human emotion.
If to err is human, and to forgive is divine, then IT will be carrying out scripts like a pound of flesh without a drop of blood.
